【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2018年8月30日 華春瑩

喜歡口譯的同學(xué)，大多抱有一個(gè)外交官的理想，而雙語例行記者會(huì)上快節(jié)奏的你問我答及現(xiàn)場(chǎng)翻譯，則給我們提供了寶貴的學(xué)習(xí)資源。下面是小編整理的關(guān)于【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2018年8月30日 華春瑩的資料，希望大家在這些唇槍舌劍中，提升英語，更熱愛祖國(guó)！

2018年8月30日外交部發(fā)言人華春瑩主持例行記者會(huì)

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying’s Regular Press Conference on August 30, 2018

應(yīng)國(guó)務(wù)委員兼外交部長(zhǎng)王毅邀請(qǐng)，冰島外交部長(zhǎng)格維茲勒于爾·索爾·索爾達(dá)松將于9月6日至10日對(duì)中國(guó)進(jìn)行正式訪問。

At the invitation of State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Gudlaugur Thór Thórdarson, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Iceland, will pay an official visit to China from September 6 to 10.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，美國(guó)政府匿名人士稱，中國(guó)給太平洋島國(guó)提供大量貸款的行為會(huì)導(dǎo)致這些國(guó)家落入債務(wù)困境，美對(duì)此表示關(guān)切。與此同時(shí)，美國(guó)、澳大利亞、法國(guó)、英國(guó)計(jì)劃在太平洋島國(guó)新增設(shè)使領(lǐng)館，并增加經(jīng)濟(jì)援助，以此抗衡中國(guó)在地區(qū)的影響力。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Q: According to a report, an anonymous source from the US government said that the large amounts of loans China provides to the Pacific island countries will make them highly indebted and the US is concerned about that. In the meantime, the US, Australia, France and the UK plan to set up new embassies in the Pacific island countries and scale up economic assistance in this region to counter China’s influence. What' your comment?

 

答：你提到這篇報(bào)道采訪的是美國(guó)政府匿名人士。我記得日前特朗普總統(tǒng)發(fā)“推特”稱，所有以“匿名人士”為消息源的報(bào)道都是編造的，都是假新聞。我不知道你說的這條報(bào)道符不符合這一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。

A: This report you mentioned quoted from an interview with an anonymous source. I remember that recently President Trump tweeted that when you see “anonymous source”, stop reading the story, it is fiction. I was wondering whether this report is one of that kind.

 

近段時(shí)期，的確有一些西方媒體炒作所謂的“中國(guó)債務(wù)陷阱”問題。我就感到很奇怪，同樣是資金，怎么西方國(guó)家提供的就是“餡餅”，而中方一提供就變成了“陷阱”？這是不是赤裸裸的雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)？

There are some Western media that have been playing up the so-called “China debt trap” issue. I can’t help but wonder why the money is “money pie” when it is offered by the Western countries but “money trap” when offered by China? Isn’t it glaring double-standard?

 

我要指出，中方提供的有關(guān)貸款從來不附帶任何政治條件。我們高度關(guān)注受援國(guó)債務(wù)的可持續(xù)性，充分尊重受援國(guó)政府的意愿，把資金投向基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施等受援國(guó)急需發(fā)展且存在資金缺口的領(lǐng)域，幫助有關(guān)國(guó)家克服發(fā)展瓶頸，增強(qiáng)造血功能，從而促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展，改善當(dāng)?shù)孛裆?，受到受援?guó)政府和人民的熱烈歡迎。

I shall point out that the relevant Chinese loans have no political strings. We pay high attention to the debt sustainability of the recipient countries and fully respect the will of their governments. By funding infrastructure and other areas that lag behind for short of money, we have helped the relevant countries break bottlenecks, enhance their capacity for independent development, realize social and economic sustainable development, and improve people’s livelihood. The governments and people of the recipient countries warmly welcome that.

 

我想奉勸有關(guān)人士，不要在別人埋頭建路時(shí)自己忙著去“挖坑”，而應(yīng)與中方一道，真心實(shí)意地為其他國(guó)家的發(fā)展多做好事和實(shí)事。

I would like to advise the relevant people to stop setting up roadblocks when others are helping build roads. They should join China to do something real good for the development of other countries.

 

問：美國(guó)白宮聲明再次質(zhì)疑中方在幫助解決半島核問題中扮演的角色。美方聲稱朝鮮問題部分由美中貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端引起，朝鮮正因美中貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端面臨來自中國(guó)的巨大壓力。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Q: The White House statement once again expressed doubt over China’s role in resolving the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue. The US said the DPRK issue is partly caused by the China-US trade disputes, and the DPRK is under tremendous pressure from China because of the disputes. What’s your comment?

 

答：很多人可能跟我有一樣的感覺，美方這種歪曲事實(shí)、不負(fù)責(zé)任的“神邏輯”果然世界第一，真不是一般人能夠理解的了的。

A: Many may share this feeling with me: the US is the best in using twisted logics to irresponsibly distort facts. But their absurd logic is really beyond the apprehension of ordinary people.

 

連日來，我們已經(jīng)多次重申了中國(guó)在半島問題上的政策立場(chǎng)。我愿再次強(qiáng)調(diào)，中國(guó)的外交政策包括在朝鮮半島問題上的政策是明確、一貫的，具有很強(qiáng)的穩(wěn)定性和連續(xù)性。希望美方能像中方一樣重信守諾，為推動(dòng)政治解決半島問題發(fā)揮積極、建設(shè)性和負(fù)責(zé)任的作用。面對(duì)當(dāng)前出現(xiàn)的一些曲折和困難，應(yīng)該多從自身找原因，進(jìn)行反思，而不是反復(fù)無常，諉過于人。

All these days we have been reiterating China’s policy and stance on the Peninsula issue. I would like to stress again that China’s foreign policies, including that on the Korean Peninsula issue, is clear and consistent, which has strong stability and consistency. We hope the US will honor its words and play a positive, constructive and responsible role in promoting the political settlement of the Peninsula issue, just like China does. In face of the setbacks and difficulties at this point, it should find out and reflect upon its own problems, rather than flip-flop and shift blames on others.

 

對(duì)于美方各種花式“甩鍋”，對(duì)不起，我們不想接，也不能接。

The US wants to make China a scapegoat. But so sorry, we don’t want to be one. And don’t even think of making us one.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，今天，日方官員就中國(guó)外交部拒絕《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》采訪日本外務(wù)省次官訪華會(huì)見活動(dòng)向中方提出抗議。中方對(duì)此有何回應(yīng)？能否告知外交部拒絕《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》采訪的原因？《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》的哪些報(bào)道是有問題的？

Q: A Japanese government official lodged protests with China over the Chinese Foreign Ministry not allowing the Sankei Shimbun to participate in a pool interview of their Japanese Vice Foreign Minister. What’s your response? Could you tell us the reason for that rejection? What reports have the Sankei Shimbun made that China finds problematic?

 

答：我剛剛看到了法新社報(bào)道的日本官房長(zhǎng)官菅義偉有關(guān)表態(tài)，我們對(duì)此不能接受。

A: I just saw the relevant remarks by Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga, which we cannot accept.

 

你昨天下午出席外交部記者會(huì)了嗎？昨天下午來記者會(huì)的記者朋友都知道，昨天一名日本記者問到有一家日媒?jīng)]去參加采訪活動(dòng)的問題，我當(dāng)時(shí)不了解情況，答應(yīng)會(huì)后去了解一下。從昨天下午一家日本媒體問這個(gè)問題，到今天上午《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》發(fā)表報(bào)道稱中方“非法”拒絕《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》合法采訪要求，再到剛才日方官員就此表態(tài)，我覺得這簡(jiǎn)直就是一出非常生動(dòng)的、活脫脫的倒打一耙的戲。

Did you attend our press conference yesterday afternoon? Those who were here may remember that a Japanese journalist asked about one Japanese media being barred from the pool coverage. I was not aware of the situation back then and promised to check on the matter. Since then, the Sankei Shimbun has reported this morning that China “illegally” rejected its lawful request for coverage, and this afternoon a Japanese official has made remarks on this issue. All these false accusations make up a good drama of blame-shifting.

 

在中國(guó)常駐的外國(guó)記者們都知道，任何重要外事活動(dòng)的現(xiàn)場(chǎng)新聞安排，都是由駐在國(guó)和來訪國(guó)雙方通過友好協(xié)商，本著相互尊重和友好對(duì)等的原則確定，包括根據(jù)活動(dòng)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)條件對(duì)采訪人數(shù)予以適當(dāng)控制，以保證采訪活動(dòng)有序安全進(jìn)行。這點(diǎn)你們大家應(yīng)該都不會(huì)有任何異議。（記者點(diǎn)頭）同樣，昨天下午的活動(dòng)也是由雙方商定采訪安排。據(jù)我了解，《日本經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞》、NHK、《讀賣新聞》在活動(dòng)開始前一小時(shí)向外交部新聞司工作人員確認(rèn)將準(zhǔn)時(shí)參加，但后來情況發(fā)生了變化。我很好奇，這到底是有關(guān)媒體自己的意愿？還是有什么人從中施加了什么壓力、說了什么話、做了什么事？對(duì)此，我希望日本官方特別是日本駐華使館給我們一個(gè)清楚的交代。

Resident foreign correspondents in China understand that the media coverage of any important diplomatic event is arranged through friendly talks between the host and the visiting countries under the principle of mutual respect, amity and reciprocity. The number of correspondents allowed in will be properly managed in light of the conditions of the event venues to ensure order and security. I do not believe you would have any problem with this. (Journalist nodded) That is also how yesterday afternoon’s event was arranged. As far as I know, one hour in advance of the event, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, the NHK and the Yomiuri Shimbun all confirmed their attendance to the staff of the Information Department of the Foreign Ministry, but things did not turn out that way later. I was wondering whether they made that choice on their own or under the pressure of others? I hope the Japanese government, especially the Japanese Embassy in China could give us an answer.

 

至于你問為什么不讓《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》采訪，中國(guó)對(duì)外國(guó)在華記者采訪報(bào)道，一貫是積極、友善地提供幫助和便利。大家來外交部記者會(huì)采訪遇到過任何障礙嗎？日本在華有28家媒體，約一百名記者，采訪活動(dòng)應(yīng)該沒有受到過什么限制或遇到困難吧?！懂a(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》稱中方“非法”地阻止他們“合法”采訪。我想問一下，北京有600多名外國(guó)記者，難道每一場(chǎng)外事活動(dòng)都要允許600名記者參加，這才叫合法嗎？如果不允許《產(chǎn)經(jīng)》去，而別的媒體記者去了，這就是非法嗎？或者允許《產(chǎn)經(jīng)》去，而別的媒體記者沒能去，這就是合法嗎？所以，我覺得無論是《產(chǎn)經(jīng)新聞》，還是日方有關(guān)官員，對(duì)這一問題都應(yīng)有清醒、清楚和正確的認(rèn)識(shí)。雙方通過協(xié)商安排現(xiàn)場(chǎng)新聞采訪報(bào)道的國(guó)際慣例應(yīng)得到尊重。我們希望與各家外國(guó)媒體繼續(xù)保持良好溝通，心平氣和地討論彼此的關(guān)切、希望或要求。中國(guó)外交部新聞司也愿一如既往地為各位外國(guó)記者朋友在華依法采訪報(bào)道提供便利和服務(wù)。有什么問題及時(shí)來找我們，我們一定會(huì)予以很好地處理。

As for why the Sankei Shimbun was not allowed in for the coverage, I shall say China has always been helping and facilitating the work of resident journalists in an active and friendly manner. Have you encountered any barriers when attending our press conferences here? There are 28 Japanese media and around 100 Japanese correspondents in China. I suppose they haven’t met any restrictions or problems in their reporting. The Sankei Shimbun accused the Chinese side of “illegally” blocking their “l(fā)awful” coverage. I would like to ask this question: there are over 600 foreign correspondents in Beijing, does “l(fā)awful” mean we have to get these 600 correspondents all in for each and every diplomatic event? Is the legality of this whole thing dependent on the attendance of the Sankei Shimbun? Can it be said that their appearance makes it “l(fā)awful” and disapperance “unlawful”? Therefore, I think both the Sankei Shimbun and the relevant Japanese official need to get a sober, clear and correct understanding of this issue. The international practice of making coverage arrangements through bilateral negotiations should be respected. We want to maintain good ties with all foreign media and calmly talk about each other’s concerns, wishes or requests. The Information Department will remain as dedicated to providing convenience and service to foreign correspondents for their work in China. You can always talk to us in case of any problem and we will properly work it out for you.

 

你們共同社記者在中國(guó)非?；钴S，工作非常勤奮，報(bào)道也很多。但坦白說，也不是所有報(bào)道都完全符合事實(shí)，令我們高興和滿意的。但是，你們的采訪遇到過任何障礙或困難嗎？沒有？對(duì)不對(duì)？（記者點(diǎn)頭）

You and your colleagues from the Kyodo News are very active in China. You have worked very hard and diligently. To be frank, not all your reports are factual and to our liking, but have you met any obstacles or difficulties in your reporting? You haven’t, have you? (Journalist nodded)

 

追問：關(guān)于日方官員就此向中方提出抗議，中方有何回應(yīng)？

Follow-up: What’s your response to the protest lodged by the Japanese official?

 

答：我們不接受這種無理的抗議。日本政府應(yīng)對(duì)自己的媒體進(jìn)行引導(dǎo)和約束，要求日本媒體在中國(guó)或其他國(guó)家遵守駐在國(guó)法律法規(guī)，客觀公正報(bào)道駐在國(guó)情況，多做促進(jìn)日本和駐在國(guó)了解和合作的事，為此發(fā)揮建設(shè)性作用，而不是破壞性作用。這是一個(gè)基本常識(shí)，希望日方有關(guān)官員能認(rèn)識(shí)到這一點(diǎn)。

A: We won’t accept such unreasonable protest. The Japanese government should guide and restrain the Japanese media, asking them to abide by the laws and regulations of China and other countries they work in, make objective and unbiased reports, and contribute to better understanding and cooperation between the two sides. They should play a constructive rather than destructive role to this end. This is common sense and we hope the relevant Japanese official will come to realize that.

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，近日中方成立了最高人民法院國(guó)際商事專家委員會(huì)。你能否介紹一下成立該委員會(huì)的考慮？

Q: China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) has established a committee of international commercial experts. What are the considerations behind setting up this committee?

 

答：今年是“一帶一路”倡議提出五周年，推進(jìn)“一帶一路”國(guó)際合作面臨重要機(jī)遇。正如王毅國(guó)務(wù)委員在今年7月出席“一帶一路”法治合作國(guó)際論壇時(shí)所指出的，“規(guī)則和法治既是‘一帶一路’走向世界的通行證，也是應(yīng)對(duì)各種不確定性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和挑戰(zhàn)的安全閥”。中方高度重視“一帶一路”相關(guān)法治保障與合作，將其視為“一帶一路”必不可少的基礎(chǔ)工程。我們與各國(guó)簽署“一帶一路”合作文件，都明確寫入“承擔(dān)各自國(guó)際法義務(wù)”、“遵守國(guó)內(nèi)法律法規(guī)”等內(nèi)容，表明了“一帶一路”建設(shè)既尊重通行的國(guó)際法，也遵守各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法的立場(chǎng)。

A: As the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) celebrates its fifth birthday this year, international cooperation on this initiative is also faced with important opportunities. Just like State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi said at the Forum on the Belt and Road Legal Cooperation which was held in July that rules and rule of law are essential for the BRI to develop in the world, and they are also the safety valve against uncertainties and challenges. China attached great importance to the Belt and Road legal safeguards and cooperation which is an indispensable and fundamental part of the BRI. In the BRI cooperation documents we signed with other countries, there are clear stipulations of shouldering each other’s obligations under international law and observing domestic laws and regulations, which demonstrates that the BRI respects the universal international law as well as the domestic laws of respective countries.

 

繼今年7月“一帶一路”法治合作國(guó)際論壇召開后，8月26日最高人民法院國(guó)際商事專家委員會(huì)正式組建。這是“一帶一路”國(guó)際法治合作的重要制度創(chuàng)新，將有助于推動(dòng)公正、專業(yè)、高效解決國(guó)際商事糾紛，為“一帶一路”建設(shè)營(yíng)造穩(wěn)定、公平、透明、可預(yù)期的法治化營(yíng)商環(huán)境，為各方更好地參與“一帶一路”建設(shè)提供更加堅(jiān)實(shí)的法律支撐和制度保障。

Following the heels of the Forum on the Belt and Road Legal Cooperation in July, the SPC’s International Commercial Expert Committee was officially established on August 26. As an important institutional innovation for the BRI legal cooperation, it will promote the just, professional and efficient settlement of international commercial disputes, ensure a stable, fair, transparent and predictable law-based business environment, thus ensuring more legal and institutional support for the BRI.

 

隨著“一帶一路”建設(shè)進(jìn)入全面務(wù)實(shí)合作新階段，法治合作也站在新的起點(diǎn)上。未來，中方將繼續(xù)本著共商共建共享的原則，與各參與方一道進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)國(guó)際規(guī)則標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)接，完善法治保障體系，營(yíng)造法治化營(yíng)商環(huán)境，高質(zhì)量高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)推進(jìn)“一帶一路”建設(shè)。

The BRI has entered a new phase of comprehensive and practical cooperation, the BRI legal cooperation is also placed at a new starting point. We will continue to uphold the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits, enhance the correlation rate between China’s national standards and international ones, improve legal safeguard system, create a law-based business environment, and ensure high-quality and high-standard BRI development.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)有議員呼吁美政府制裁涉嫌“侵犯新疆維吾爾族人權(quán)”的中國(guó)官員。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Q: Some US lawmakers called for the US government to impose sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for “human rights abuses against minority Uyghurs in China’s Xinjiang”. What is your comment?

 

答：如果一個(gè)人公正地、不帶任何偏見地看待中國(guó)少數(shù)民族政策和少數(shù)民族享有的平等權(quán)利，就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)少數(shù)民族政策和實(shí)際情況比美國(guó)好很多。中國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)院新聞辦公室發(fā)布的《美國(guó)的人權(quán)記錄》列舉了美國(guó)在種族歧視和人權(quán)保護(hù)方面存在的種種問題。相關(guān)美國(guó)議員沒有資格就少數(shù)民族問題對(duì)中國(guó)進(jìn)行橫加指責(zé)。

A: If China’s policies on ethnic minority groups and the equal rights enjoyed by them are viewed without bias and prejudice, the conclusion will be drawn that China’s policies and record in this regard are actually far better than the US. The Human Rights Record of the US released by the Information Office of the State Council enumerated various problems facing the US in terms of racial discrimination and human rights protection. These US lawmakers have no right to make these unwarranted accusations on ethnic minority issue against China.

 

中國(guó)政府依法保護(hù)公民的宗教信仰自由，中國(guó)各族人民依法享有宗教自由。我們希望美方正視和尊重事實(shí)，摒棄偏見，停止采取損害中美互信與合作的言行。

The Chinese government protects its citizens’ right to freedom of religious belief and people of all ethnic groups enjoy freedom of religious belief in accordance with the law. We hope the US side could recognize and respects facts, discard prejudice and stop doing or saying anything to undermine mutual trust and cooperation between the two sides.

 

我還想奉勸那些拿著美國(guó)納稅人錢的美國(guó)議員，他們理應(yīng)集中精力專注做好自己的本職工作，服務(wù)美國(guó)人民，而不是整天瞎操心、干涉別國(guó)內(nèi)政，充當(dāng)“人權(quán)法官”，對(duì)別國(guó)橫加指責(zé)，甚至威脅實(shí)施什么無理制裁。

I would like to advise those US lawmakers, who are paid by taxpayers’ money, to focus on doing their job and serving the Americans, instead of poking their noses in other countries’ domestic affairs, acting as some kind of “human rights judge” to make groundless accusations, or even threatening to impose unreasonable sanctions.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，彭博新聞社主辦的“新經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇”原計(jì)劃于今年11月在北京舉行，現(xiàn)在被迫轉(zhuǎn)場(chǎng)至新加坡。有報(bào)道稱，這可能與中美經(jīng)貿(mào)摩擦有關(guān)。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Q: Does the Foreign Ministry have any comment on the Bloomberg New Economy Forum scheduled in November being moved from Beijing to Singapore, including reports that China-US trade frictions may have contributed to that decision?

 

答：請(qǐng)向論壇主辦方詢問。

A: You need to ask the host of this event.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，中國(guó)和梵蒂岡將于9月舉行新一輪會(huì)談，你能否證實(shí)？有關(guān)主教任命問題的協(xié)議是否將在10月簽署？

Q: Reports say that China and the Vatican will hold a new round of talks in September. Can you confirm that and is an agreement on appointment of bishops going to be signed in October?

 

答：中梵之間保持著有效接觸。中方對(duì)改善中梵關(guān)系始終抱有誠(chéng)意，并為此作出了不懈努力。我們?cè)竿蠓嚼^續(xù)相向而行,推動(dòng)雙方建設(shè)性對(duì)話和關(guān)系改善進(jìn)程不斷取得新進(jìn)展。

A: China and the Vatican maintain effective communication. China is sincere towards improving ties with the Vatican and has been making continuous efforts. We stand ready to meet the Vatican halfway to promote constructive dialogues and further improve relations.

 

問：據(jù)報(bào)道，在中國(guó)民航局要求在期限內(nèi)將臺(tái)灣的稱呼改為“中國(guó)臺(tái)灣”后，美國(guó)聯(lián)合航空網(wǎng)頁上中國(guó)大陸、臺(tái)灣、香港都變成以“貨幣”選擇所在地。臺(tái)灣所謂“外事部門”的發(fā)言人稱，對(duì)美聯(lián)航這種“彈性做法”表示感謝。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Q: In response to the Civil Aviation Administration of China's demand to classify “Taiwan” as “Taiwan, China”, the United Airlines’ website shows that mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong can be selected as locations according to the currency. The spokesperson of the department in Taiwan in charge of so-called “foreign affairs” expressed appreciation for such “flexible workaround”. What is your comment?

 

答：航空公司網(wǎng)站涉臺(tái)灣名稱問題由中國(guó)民航部門具體負(fù)責(zé)，具體如何處理請(qǐng)問主管部門。

A: I would refer you to the Civil Aviation Administration for details as they are in charge of this specific issue.

 

我只想強(qiáng)調(diào)一點(diǎn)，世界上只有一個(gè)中國(guó)，臺(tái)灣是中國(guó)的一部分，這是客觀事實(shí)、基本常識(shí)和國(guó)際共識(shí)，也是任何外國(guó)公司在華經(jīng)營(yíng)的基本遵循。有關(guān)人士再怎么想要有“彈性”，也無法跳出一個(gè)中國(guó)的根本原則和遵循。

I just want to stress that there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is part of China. This is the objective fact, common sense and international consensus. It lays out a basic principle for foreign companies operating in China to follow. However flexible they may try to get, there is simply no way to sidestep the one-China principle.