Peter L?scher, the first outsider to become chief executive of Siemens, one of the world's biggest electrical engineering firms, spent his first three months at the firm travelling and listening. Then on October 4th he announced plans to centralise the conglomerate, reduce its nine divisions to three and downsize its 11-man executive board, which would truncate the power of the company's regional bosses. On the same day Siemens accepted a €210m ($285m) fine imposed by a court in Munich for bribery by its communications division, forgoing the right to appeal.
The coincidence could mark a turning point in attempts to change the firm's culture and put past scandals behind it. Last November police raided Siemens's offices, starting a scourge on bribery which so far has cost the company its chairman, its chief executive, another board member and its chief compliance officer, as well as at least €239m in fines and €179m in tax liabilities (the bribes had been deducted). What is more, in the nine months to June 30th alone, the bill for legal expenses and external advice came to €188m.
The affair has cost a great deal of management time, too. Debevoise & Plimpton, an American law firm, and forensic auditors from Deloitte are still scouring the company for evidence of more irregularities. In America the Department of Justice has two investigations running, and the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) is also examining claims of corruption. Legal proceedings in America alone could cost Siemens billions of dollars, say analysts, although Siemens argues in its most recent quarterly filing with the SEC that its “consolidated financial position should not be materially affected” by the welter of litigation.
Analysts are confident that Siemens will not only survive but benefit from all the upheaval. “Comparable American companies have gone through this, so have Alstom in France and ABB in Sweden, and they have emerged stronger and better run,” says James Stettler of Dresdner Kleinwort, an investment bank.
The three divisions Mr. L?scher has unveiled are energy products (such as power turbines and transmission equipment), infrastructure (such as factories and trains) and health care (such as MRI scanners and other clever medical kit). That does not necessarily mean Mr. L?scher will sell the businesses that do not fit, such as Osram, a maker of light bulbs, BSH, a joint venture with Bosch in household appliances, and Nokia Siemens Networks, recently formed to build telecom infrastructure.
The company's supervisory board will vet the changes on November 28th. Mr. L?scher may have most difficulty winning approval for those that will affect workers in Germany, whose representatives make up half the membership of the 20-strong supervisory board. If he gets his way, however, Mr. L?scher's next proposal may be to register Siemens as a Societas Europaea (SE) instead of as a German joint-stock company (AG). That would entail a slimmer supervisory board with reduced representation for German workers, but would give a voice to employees abroad. Other icons of German business, most notably Siemens's Munich neighbour, Allianz, a big insurer, have already made the switch. Mr. L?scher is chummy with Paul Achleitner, a member of Allianz's board and a fellow Austrian, with whom he recently stayed for three months.
1. The word “forgoing” (Line 5, Paragraph 1) most probably means _____.
[A] refusing
[B] reserving
[C] withdrawing
[D] considering
2. What Mr. L?scher will probably do to the three divisions he has unveiled?
[A] He will transfer them to other companies.
[B] He will downsize the executive board of the three divisions.
[C] He will recombine them into large division.
[D] It is not mentioned in the passage.
3. Mr. L?scher wants to register Siemens as an SE instead of an AG because _____.
[A] he aims to cut the number of German representatives in the supervisory board
[B] he seeks to centralize the conglomerate
[C] he wants to include multiple voices of the employees so as to enhance the democracy of the decision-making
[D] he strives to transform the company into a more international one
4. Towards the future of Siemens, the author's attitude can be said to be _____.
[A] optimistic
[B] pessimistic
[C] neutral
[D] unclear
5. By the close relationship between Mr. L?scher and Paul Achleitner, the author wants to imply that _____.
[A] Siemens will gain great support from Allianz
[B] Mr. L?scher made the decision to have a change under the influence of his friend
[C] Mr. L?scher wanted switch Siemens into an insurer in the future
[D] Mr. L?scher greatly valued his friend's sugges-tion
1. The word “forgoing” (Line 5, Paragraph 1) most probably means _____.
[A] refusing
[B] reserving
[C] withdrawing
[D] considering
1. forgoing這個詞(第一段第五行)最有可能的意思是 _____。
[A] 拒絕
[B] 保留
[C] 撤銷
[D] 考慮
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:猜詞題。根據(jù)上下文,西門子已經(jīng)接受了罰金,而從文章其余部分來看,它也比較積極地處理了這些法律糾紛。因此,最有可能的就是它放棄了申訴的權(quán)利。所以,答案為C。
2. What Mr. L?scher will probably do to the three divisions he has unveiled?
[A] He will transfer them to other companies.
[B] He will downsize the executive board of the three divisions.
[C] He will recombine them into large division.
[D] It is not mentioned in the passage.
2. L?scher先生對于自己公布的三個部門將會采取什么措施?
[A] 他將會把三個部門轉(zhuǎn)讓給其他公司。
[B] 他將縮小三個部門的執(zhí)行董事會。
[C] 他將把它們合并為一個大部門。
[D] 文章中沒有提及。
答案:D 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細(xì)節(jié)題。關(guān)于對三個部門的處置,在第五段中提到,并不一定會出售那些不適合的企業(yè),而根據(jù)第一段,這三個部門肯定是要裁減掉的,但是具體以哪種方式來操作文章中并未提及,因此,答案為D。
3. Mr. L?scher wants to register Siemens as an SE instead of an AG because _____.
[A] he aims to cut the number of German representatives in the supervisory board
[B] he seeks to centralize the conglomerate
[C] he wants to include multiple voices of the employees so as to enhance the democracy of the decision-making
[D] he strives to transform the company into a more international one
3. L?scher先生想要把西門子公司注冊為SE而不是德國合資公司,是因為 _____。
[A] 他的目的在于減少德國籍代表在監(jiān)管委員會中的席位
[B] 他希望將集中控制西門子公司
[C] 他希望能夠聽到雇員不同的聲音,以便加強(qiáng)決策的民主化
[D] 他努力想把公司變得更加國際化
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆☆
分析:推理題。最后一段提到,他想改變公司性質(zhì),這樣就需要更為精簡的監(jiān)管委員會,德國工人的代表減少了,這與第一段他提到的權(quán)力集中化是一致的。因此,其目的還是要集中控制西門子,所以選項B是正確答案。選項A只是他的一個做法,但不是最終目的。選項C和D只是其集中控制的一些步驟,并不是終極目的,因此也都不是正確選項。
4. Towards the future of Siemens, the author's attitude can be said to be _____.
[A] optimistic
[B] pessimistic
[C] neutral
[D] unclear
4. 對于西門子的未來,作者的態(tài)度可以說是 _____。
[A] 樂觀的
[B] 悲觀的
[C] 中立的
[D] 不清楚的
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆
分析:態(tài)度題。從全文來看,作者比較客觀地描述了目前西門子的狀況,但對于未來并沒有具體的態(tài)度表述。因此,答案為C。
5. By the close relationship between Mr. L?scher and Paul Achleitner, the author wants to imply that _____.
[A] Siemens will gain great support from Allianz
[B] Mr. L?scher made the decision to have a change under the influence of his friend
[C] Mr. L?scher wanted switch Siemens into an insurer in the future
[D] Mr. L?scher greatly valued his friend's suggestion
5. 作者提到L?scher先生和Paul Achleitner關(guān)系密切,是為了說明 _____。
[A] 西門子將從Allianz那里獲得很大的支持
[B] L?scher先生是受到朋友的影響才決定要改革的
[C] L?scher先生想在未來把西門子轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐粋€保險公司
[D] L?scher先生非常重視朋友的建議
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:推理題。文章最后提到了Allianz已經(jīng)進(jìn)行了這樣的改革,而L?scher和該公司管理委員會成員的關(guān)系好,而且最近一直在一起,那么可以推斷,L?scher做出的一些改革決定可能就是受到他的影響。因此,選項B最為符合題意。
Peter L?scher是世界最大的電器公司之一——西門子的首席執(zhí)行官中第一位行外人,他上任的前三個月就是在公司內(nèi)巡視、傾聽。10月4日,他宣布計劃集中控制公司,將九個部門縮減為三個,并縮小11人的執(zhí)行委員會,這也將減少公司各地經(jīng)理的權(quán)利。同一天,西門子接受了慕尼黑一家法庭的2.1億歐元(合2.85億美元)的罰金,原因是其通信部門行賄受賄。目前西門子已經(jīng)放棄了上訴的權(quán)利。
這種巧合是公司改變企業(yè)文化和拋棄過往丑聞的轉(zhuǎn)折點。去年11月,警察突然搜查了西門子的辦公室,開始了一場關(guān)于行賄受賄審查的責(zé)難,到目前為止已導(dǎo)致該公司的主席、首席執(zhí)行官、董事會另一個成員和其首席監(jiān)察官被罷免,罰金最少有2.39億歐元,還有1.79億歐元的稅收債務(wù)(賄賂金已經(jīng)扣除)。除此之外,截至6月30日的九個月內(nèi),法律費(fèi)用和行外通知的賬單已經(jīng)達(dá)到1.88億歐元。
該事件也耗費(fèi)了大量的管理時間。一家美國法律公司Debevoise & Plimpton和來自Deloitte的法院審計員還在繼續(xù)審查公司,試圖找出更多不規(guī)范的證據(jù)。在美國,司法部進(jìn)行兩項調(diào)查,安全與證券委員會也在調(diào)查腐敗事件。分析家稱,僅在美國的法律訴訟就要耗費(fèi)西門子幾十億美元,雖然最近與安全與證券委員會進(jìn)行的季度檔案整理中,西門子認(rèn)為其“鞏固的金融地位不應(yīng)當(dāng)因為不斷的訴訟而受到實質(zhì)性影響”。
分析家斷言,西門子不僅會安然度過困境,而且還會從這次劇變中受益。“美國與之相似的公司已經(jīng)經(jīng)歷過這些了,法國的Alstom和瑞典的ABB也都經(jīng)歷過,之后它們都變得更為強(qiáng)大,運(yùn)營也更加成功。”投資銀行Dresdner Kleinwort的James Stettler這樣說。
L?scher先生公布的縮減后的三個部門是能源產(chǎn)品部門(如電力渦輪和傳導(dǎo)設(shè)備)、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施部門(如工廠和火車)以及衛(wèi)生保健部門(如MRI掃描儀和其他智能醫(yī)療用具)。但這并不代表L?scher先生會將不適合的企業(yè)賣掉,如燈泡制造商歐思朗以及和博世合資的家用電器公司BSH、諾基亞西門子網(wǎng)絡(luò)(最近為建立電信基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施而成立的)等。
公司的監(jiān)督管理委員會將于11月28日審查這些改革計劃。L?scher先生面臨的最大困難在于要獲得改革計劃的批準(zhǔn),而改革計劃將影響德國工人,這些工人的代表占到20個監(jiān)督管理委員會成員的一半。但是如果解決了這個問題,L?scher先生的下一個議題可能就是將西門子注冊為Societas Europaea,而不是德國合資公司。這就需要更為精簡的監(jiān)督管理委員會,減少德國工人的代表,而給海外員工更多的發(fā)言機(jī)會。德國企業(yè)的其他代表,其中最為有名的就是西門子在慕尼黑的鄰居大保險公司Allianz,已經(jīng)開始進(jìn)行這些改變。L?scher和Allianz管理委員會的成員Paul Achleitner關(guān)系甚好,此人為奧地利人,L?scher最近與他一起待了三個月。