Here's my smaller theory about Big Bang, and you're probably not going to like it. I think the show was a lot better before the two brainiacs became a foursome. To me, beefing up the roles of Rajesh and Howard over the past few seasons has spread the comedy thinner. What lifts The Big Bang Theory into frequent excellence is its one constant from the start: the brilliantly nuanced performance of Jim Parsons. I know, I know, you love Raj and Howard. Fine. All I'm saying is, if Sheldon wasn't around to prick their pretensions with his precise needling, the amount of hot air those two boys emit would burst the bubble of Big Bang's ebullience. It's my theory, and I'm sticking to it.
接下來是我對《天才理論傳》的次要看法,你們可能不喜歡。我認(rèn)為該劇有兩個(gè)主角比有四個(gè)主角時(shí)好看,最近幾季拉賈書和霍華德的戲份有所增加,這使得劇情變得松散?!短觳爬碚搨鳌分院每?,是因?yàn)閺囊婚_始就有一點(diǎn)沒有變化,那就是吉姆?帕森斯精彩細(xì)膩的表演。我知道,觀眾喜歡拉賈書和霍華德。好吧。我的意思是,如果不是謝爾登戳穿拉賈書和霍華德的自命不凡,這兩個(gè)人的大話空話會毀掉《天才理論傳》的精彩。這就是我的看法,我堅(jiān)持自己的看法。