春節(jié)大餐頓頓過后,身體“腫”的開始抗議,多少人打開搜索引擎并給自己定下要科學(xué)、自律飲食的目標(biāo)。而實(shí)際上,不要再逼自己喝下濃稠油綠的蔬菜汁了,看文章告訴你正確的飲食平衡。
測試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識(shí):
quinoa藜麥['ki?n???; kw?'n???]
wintry冬天的['w?ntr?]
immaculate完美的[?'mækj?l?t]
irreproachable無瑕疵的[?r?'pr??t??b(?)l]
unhinged精神錯(cuò)亂的[?n'hind?d]
self-loathing自我厭棄
By Bee Wilson
In this wintry season of resolutions,it is not enough any more for a plate of food to be good. For many in the grip of this or that diet philosophy,every meal must aspire to be immaculately balanced: protein-boosted and containing a full rainbow of vegetables. But perfect is the enemy of the good,as the philosopher Voltaire said. A cold,unseasoned“wellness bowl”of quinoa,sliced tofu,avocado and sprouted mung beans may be irreproachably balanced. But it isn’t half as enjoyable to eat as the kind of hearty dinner that considers flavour first and nutrition after,whether that’s a plate of eggs Florentine with toast or a dish of smoky-rich black dhal with fluffy white rice.
If a balanced diet is so healthy,why does the pursuit of it drive so many of us nuts? As an overweight and self-loathing teenager,I was a sucker for the perfect diet. But my projects for flawless eating would start with carrots and hope before ending,a few days later,in pastries and despair. In the name of“balance”(which is often a synonym for thinness),otherwise sensible people do crazy things,like force down a vat of green juiced slime in order to tick off three of their five-a-day in one go. There are even those now who swear that not-eating might be a more balanced form of nutrition than eating. Huel is a strange milkshake-like meal replacement made from oats,pea protein and a bunch of other stuff(the American equivalent is Soylent),which advertises itself as“nutritionally complete food”. The implication is that proper food — the tasty stuff that we spear with a fork — is woefully incomplete.
The idea of eating for the sake of balance could always look a little unhinged. As the food writer MFK Fisher complained in her 1942 book How to Cook a Wolf,there was a tendency in mid-20th century America for“meal-balancing”. This meant combining“a lot of dull and sometimes actively hostile foods”in a single meal,purely for the sake of covering your nutritional bases. Fisher found it“stupid”that so many Americans felt they needed to start the day with a monotonous gamut of juice,coffee,hot or cold cereal,“eggs and cured pork in any of about four ways”,lest they might be lacking in anything.
Now,if anything,our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive. It’s become less about how many nutritious foods you can cram on a plate and more about how many things you can cut out. Many people — influenced by clean-eating gurus — have become convinced that there is such a thing as an absolutely good or absolutely bad food. Entire food groups — from carbohydrates to dairy — are expunged from the diet in the name of balance and glow,as if the tiniest nibble of bagel might set you off kilter. This is a dangerous kind of balance to pursue.
Such paranoid reactions are to be expected,however,in a food supply which has itself become colossally unbalanced,mostly because it is drowning in sweetness. You try to buy a“healthy”snack only to discover that your“protein bar”is basically a brownie with pretensions. Given we live in a world in which sugar is present in 80 per cent of all supermarket foods and newsagents push you to buy a 200g slab of chocolate when all you wanted was a magazine,it’s time to take balance back in our own hands.
We must each find our own equilibrium when it comes to food. MFK Fisher wisely said that we should aim to“balance the day,not each meal in the day”. A balanced diet might mean spinach and chickpea soup for lunch but spaghetti and clams with a delicious salad for dinner. Real balance means navigating the bewildering food environment we live in and still finding a way to eat with gusto and joy. It means staying on an even keel — not starving,not bingeing — and ignoring any voices that promise you a perfect diet. It means worrying less about the balance of proteins to carbs in your body and more about the balance of oil to vinegar in your vinaigrette.
1.In Fisher’s book,when was there a tendency in America for“meal-balancing”?
A. in mid-19th century
B. in mid-20th century
C. in early of 19th century
D. in early of 20th century
答案(1)
2.What is Fisher’opinion about those Americans who are worried if they don’t have balanced meal?
A. Stupid
B. Autonomic
C. Useless
D. Understandable
答案(2)
3.What is the key point of this article?
A. We should start a day with a balanced meal
B. A meal should contain all kind of nutrition
C. We should eat less sweet and chocolate
D. Our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive.
答案(3)
4.What is not the real balanced diet according to the article?
A. Balance the day,not each meal in the day
B. Follow the voice which promise you a perfect diet
C. Staying on an even keel — not starving,not bingeing
D. Navigating the bewildering food environment we live in and still finding a way to eat with gusto and joy
答案(4)
(1) 答案:B.in mid-20th century
解釋:在Fisher的書中提到20世紀(jì)中期的美國開始了注重飲食平衡的趨勢。
(2) 答案:A.Stupid
解釋:Fisher認(rèn)為,如果因?yàn)闆]有平衡的飲食便產(chǎn)生焦慮,覺得自己缺少營養(yǎng)是愚蠢的想法。
(3) 答案:D.Our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive.
解釋:我們對(duì)平衡飲食的認(rèn)識(shí)有些起反向作用。
(4) 答案:B.Follow the voice which promise you a perfect diet
解釋:闡述了作者關(guān)于正確的飲食平衡的觀點(diǎn)。