CNN News: 穆勒?qǐng)?bào)告

Some leaning (ph) U.S. law makers spend Monday reviewing the Mueller report we mentioned last week. The results of a special investigation led by former FBI director, Robert Mueller.

一些美國的法律制定者星期一將審議我們上星期提到的穆勒?qǐng)?bào)告。這份報(bào)告是由前聯(lián)邦調(diào)查局局長(zhǎng)羅伯特·米勒領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的特別調(diào)查的結(jié)果。

The full report was released to Congress on Thursday but it had some redactions, some edits and a less edited version was given to House and Senate leaders yesterday. One main focus of the report concerned Russia. Did the campaign of U.S. President Donald Trump illegally coordinate with the other country to win the election.

這份完整的報(bào)告已于周四向國會(huì)公布，但其中有一些修改，也有一些編輯，而較少編輯的版本已于昨日提交給參眾兩院領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人。報(bào)告的一個(gè)主要焦點(diǎn)與俄羅斯有關(guān)。美國總統(tǒng)唐納德·特朗普的競(jìng)選團(tuán)隊(duì)是否非法與其他國家進(jìn)行密謀以贏得大選?

The report said no that the Trump campaign did not collude with the Russian government. Another part of the report concerned the U.S. leader’s actions. Did President Trump illegally interfere with the Mueller investigation and commit the crime of obstruction of justice.

報(bào)道稱，特朗普的競(jìng)選團(tuán)隊(duì)沒有與俄羅斯政府勾結(jié)。報(bào)告的另一部分涉及美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的行動(dòng)。特朗普總統(tǒng)是否非法干預(yù)穆勒案調(diào)查，并犯有妨礙司法公正罪?

The report was more vague on that. Investigators said they couldn’t conclude for sure that the president committed a crime but that they also couldn’t conclude for sure that he didn’t. It suggested that Congress could make its own investigation into that.

報(bào)告在這一點(diǎn)上非常含糊。調(diào)查人員表示，他們不能確定總統(tǒng)是否犯罪，但也不能確定他是清白的。報(bào)告建議國會(huì)可以對(duì)此進(jìn)行自己的調(diào)查。

How politicians reacted to all this mainly depended on what political party they’re in. President Trump and other republicans say the report vindicates the president. That he didn’t illegally cooperate with Russia and that it’s time to move on.

政客們對(duì)這一切的反應(yīng)主要取決于他們所屬的政黨。特朗普總統(tǒng)和其他共和黨人表示，這份報(bào)告證明了總統(tǒng)是正確的。他沒有非法與俄羅斯合作，現(xiàn)在是時(shí)候向前看了。

Democrats have said they need to see the full Mueller report without redactions and that Congress now needs to investigate whether the president committed obstruction of justice. We don’t know yet what the next steps will be in all this but we’ll keep you updated.

民主黨人曾表示，他們需要在不進(jìn)行修訂的情況下看到穆勒的完整報(bào)告，國會(huì)現(xiàn)在需要調(diào)查總統(tǒng)是否妨礙了司法公正。我們還不知道接下來會(huì)發(fā)生什么，但是我們希望不斷更新。