https://online2.tingclass.net/lesson/shi0529/0008/8497/Anim.mp3
https://image.tingclass.net/statics/js/2012
1--You should have seen the T.V. show that was on last night, the topic it covered was really interesting; animal rights.
2--Do you really believe in that? If they are going to focus on something, they should do it on civil rights.
1--Yes, but we can’t deny that animals are vulnerable, defenseless, and are completely at the mercy of human beings.
2--I understand your point, but we continue to have transgressions against human rights. If so much attention weren’t devoted to the topic of animals, we would then concentrate more on saving a human being instead of protecting a koala.
1--You can’t compare apples and oranges; I believe that both topics are important and that we can’t ignore them, the mistreatment of animals can cause a great environmental imbalance. I believe that governments should prohibit activities like poaching.
2--Well, you are right on that point. This is the reason that I don’t buy leather and I try to buy synthetic products.
1--At least you’re doing your part. My contribution is to have a pet in the house that I treat like a member of the family.
2--As long as you don’t treat it better than your wife, it’s fine.
===================================
注解:
1.rights權益
2.vulnerable易受攻擊的
3.concentrate集中
===================================
譯文:
1--你應該看看昨晚的電視秀,它包含的話題很有意思:動物權力。
2--你真的相信那個嗎?如果他們應該關注點東西,他們應該關注公民權力。
1--是的,但是我們不能否認動物容易受到傷害,沒有防備能力,而且完全受人類擺布。
2--我知道你所說的,但是我們總是有侵犯人權的事件。如果人們不關注動物,我們應該關注如何救一個人而不是包含一只考拉。
1--你不能將不同的事物進行不公平的對比。我相信2個話題都很重要,我們都不能忽視。虐待動物能導致環(huán)境的失調(diào)。我相信政府應該繼續(xù)制止像偷獵這樣的行為。
2--你說到點子刪了。那就是我為什么不買皮制品的原因,我買人工合成的用品。
1--至少你也在幫著實現(xiàn)目標。我的貢獻是在家里養(yǎng)了個寵物,我對待寵物和對待家庭成員一樣。
2--只要你對待寵物不超過對待你妻子那樣好,就是合適的。