Thousands of writers in Los Angeles and New York went on strike this week, risking their incomes and careers. They want more money for their work when it is used online than Hollywood studios are willing to pay. Because the strike is over matters of principle, not just dollars and cents, it could last for months. The immediate effect was to shut down late-night talk shows, including Late Show with David Letterman and The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. If the last writers' strike, in 1988, is any guide, the talk shows will stay silent for a couple of months before going back on air without scripts. Soaps will be next to go, in a week or two; then prime-time dramas, a few weeks later. Some say the film business is safe, because studios have stockpiled scripts. But scripts often need tweaking by writers at the last minute.
Media companies argue that the market has become increasingly competitive and uncertain for many reasons, including Internet piracy and tumbling box-office receipts. They want to cut writers' income from “residuals”, which are payments made when a TV show is re-used. The writers are determined not to repeat the mistake they made in 1985, when they listened to the studios' plea that home video was an unproven new market and agreed to a residual payment of 0.3%, which translates into about four cents for each sale of a DVD—or one-tenth of what DVD-box manufacturers get. The writers now want a residual payment of 2.5% for re-use of material online and on mobile phones.
The studios say that Internet delivery is the same as home video, so the old rate still applies. And they refuse to pay anything to writers when content is streamed over the Internet free to viewers, supported by ads, because this is merely “promotion”. Both sides made last-minute concessions on traditional-media payments. But because new-media rights are so critical to the future earnings of writers and studios, neither was willing to compromise.
Who will suffer the most? “The strike won't affect most studios unless the writers stay out three to five months,” says a senior executive at a media conglomerate. Because writers on reality and animation programmes are not unionised, the networks will be able to switch to other forms of programming; sport will fill the gaps, too. But Moody's, a credit-rating agency, reckons that a strike lasting into late 2008 would have a serious financial impact. Broadcast networks and premium-cable channels would be hurt most, because they rely most on first-run scripted shows.
Some writers, of course, are wealthy. “I'm walking the picket line with some guys who are worth millions,” says Lou DiMaggio, a reality- and game-show writer who won an Emmy award for Win Ben Stein's Money. But the vast majority of writers, he says, earn about $50,000-75,000 a year. Mr. DiMaggio says he backed out of buying a house because of the strike; junior writers may have to go back to waiting tables. Luckily for Hollywood, however, most scribes are too devoted to their calling to be put off. Gary Goldman, a writer picketing outside Fox Studios who has worked on science-fiction thrillers such as Minority Report, says that many writers will spend their free time working on screenplays that they hope to sell to the studios on spec.
1. Which one of the following statements is TRUE of the strike?
[A] The mere aim of this strike is to increase writers' income in general.
[B] The strike is mainly relevant to the issue of scripts used on TV show and primary dramas.
[C] The strike will be effective only if it lasts for a long time.
[D] Whether the film industry will be affected by the strike or not is open to question.
2. The writers made a mistake in the strike of 1985 because _____.
[A] the studios' offer of payment increase was satisfactory
[B] they readily believed the studios' excuse out of a false judgment
[C] the union failed to unite the majority of the writers
[D] the market prospect of home videos was not so competitive and uncertain
3. Finally the writers and the studios made a compromise on _____.
[A] the TV show payments
[B] the payments of the online drama shows
[C] the payments of the mobile phone shows
[D] the payments of Internet shows
4. The word “unionised” (Line 3, Paragraph 4) most probably means _____.
[A] united
[B]organized
[C] established
[D] arranged
5. The screenplays are written by the writers in their free time will be sold to the studios _____.
[A] on a special offer
[B] with no guarantee of profit
[C] on special occasions
[D] as a speculation
1. Which one of the following statements is TRUE of the strike?
[A] The mere aim of this strike is to increase writers' income in general.
[B] The strike is mainly relevant to the issue of scripts used on TV show and primary dramas.
[C] The strike will be effective only if it lasts for a long time.
[D] Whether the film industry will be affected by the strike or not is open to question.
1. 關于這次罷工,下列哪個陳述是正確的?
[A] 這次罷工唯一的目的就是要提高編劇的整體收入。
[B] 這次罷工主要是針對用于電視節(jié)目和重點電視劇的劇本。
[C] 這次罷工只有堅持很長時間才能有效。
[D] 這次罷工是否會對電影業(yè)產(chǎn)生影響仍然是一個問題。
答案:C 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細節(jié)題。選項A,在第一段有這么一句:這次罷工不僅僅是為了錢,而更重要的是為了一些原則。因此,A不正確。B,從全文可以看出,這次罷工主要是編劇為爭取其作品在網(wǎng)上使用時能獲得較高的回報,而不是電視上,因此該選項與文章不符。C,根據(jù)第四段,罷工只有延續(xù)幾個月才能對制片商有一定影響,因此該選項符合題意。選項D,第一段最后一句提到,劇本還是需要編劇來做修改的,因此,該選項也不符合題意。正確答案為C。
2. The writers made a mistake in the strike of 1985 because _____.
[A] the studios' offer of payment increase was satisfactory
[B] they readily believed the studios' excuse out of a false judgment
[C] the union failed to unite the majority of the writers
[D] the market prospect of home videos was not so competitive and uncertain
2. 編劇們在1985年的罷工中犯了一個錯誤,因為 _____。
[A] 制片商提出的工資上漲幅度非常令人滿意
[B] 他們由于判斷錯誤而輕信了制片商的借口
[C] 工會沒有能夠團結大部分編劇
[D] 家庭錄像的市場前景并不具有競爭力,反而相當不確定
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細節(jié)題。文章第二段提到,他們不會再犯1985年罷工時的那個錯誤。在那次罷工中,編劇們聽信了制片商的借口,說家庭錄像是個新市場,有待試驗。最終他們同意只拿取很小的一部分利潤。因此,那次錯誤的原因就在于他們聽信了制片商的借口,所以B最為符合題意。A顯然與原文意思相反。選項C在原文中沒有提及,而選項D顯然與該題無關。
3. Finally the writers and the studios made a compromise on _____.
[A] the TV show payments
[B] the payments of the online drama shows
[C] the payments of the mobile phone shows
[D] the payments of Internet shows
3. 最后,編劇們和制片商在 _____ 上達成了協(xié)議。
[A] 電視節(jié)目的報酬
[B] 在線電視劇的報酬
[C] 手機節(jié)目的報酬
[D] 網(wǎng)絡節(jié)目的報酬
答案:A 難度系數(shù):☆☆☆
分析:細節(jié)題。文章第三段提到,他們已經(jīng)就傳統(tǒng)媒體節(jié)目的報酬達成了最后的協(xié)議,而關于新媒體節(jié)目的報酬還沒有達成一致意見。從文中的其他地方可以看出,所謂的新媒體就是指網(wǎng)絡和手機等,傳統(tǒng)媒體指的是電視,因此,選項A為正確答案。
4. The word “unionised” (Line 3, Paragraph 4) most probably means _____.
[A] united
[B] organized
[C] established
[D] arranged
4. unionised這個詞(第四段第三行)最有可能的意思是 _____。
[A] 聯(lián)合的
[B] 有組織的
[C] 建立的
[D] 安排的
答案:A 難度系數(shù):☆
分析:猜詞題。根據(jù)上下文的意思,因為實景劇和動畫片的編劇不是結合成一體的,因此廣播公司可以轉而播出其他形式的節(jié)目,體育節(jié)目也可以填補這個空白。因此,選項A最為符合。
5. The screenplays are written by the writers in their free time will be sold to the studios _____.
[A] on a special offer
[B] with no guarantee of profit
[C] on special occasions
[D] as a speculation
5. 編劇們在業(yè)余時間編寫的電影劇本將會 _____ 賣給制片商。
[A] 特價
[B] 對是否贏利沒有保證
[C] 特殊情形
[D] 作為投機
答案:B 難度系數(shù):☆☆
分析:猜詞題。解這個題的關鍵在于要理解on spec這個短語的意思,該短語意為“碰運氣地,對贏利沒有把握地”。再者,可以從文章內(nèi)容來推理:現(xiàn)在編劇們罷工,沒有收入,只能利用業(yè)余時間編寫劇本撞撞運氣,這樣的話,編寫出來的劇本是否能換來收入是未知的。因此,答案為B。
成千上萬洛杉磯和紐約的編劇不惜冒著失去工資和工作的風險,于這周舉行了罷工。他們希望,自己的作品在網(wǎng)上使用時,得到的報酬比好萊塢的制片商愿意支付的更多一些。因為這次罷工事關原則問題,而不僅僅是金錢的問題,因此可能會持續(xù)幾個月。罷工的直接影響就是夜間談話節(jié)目的停播,包括《David Letterman晚間談話》和《Jay Leno今夜談》。如果之前那次的編劇罷工(1988年)有點示范作用的話,那么這些談話節(jié)目得沉寂幾個月才會重新回到屏幕,但沒有劇本,接下來,肥皂劇會在一兩周內(nèi)恢復,之后幾周內(nèi)黃金時間的電視劇才會恢復播出。有人認為電影行業(yè)是安全的,因為制片商有成堆的劇本。但是在最后關頭劇本總是需要編劇做些調(diào)整。
媒體公司認為,市場競爭越來越激烈,而且因為許多原因變得更加撲朔迷離,比如網(wǎng)絡盜版和票房收入的下降。他們想要從給編劇的電視片重映報酬中卡掉一些。而編劇們決心不再犯他們1985年犯過的錯誤了,當時他們聽信了制片商的借口,說家庭錄像還是一個未知的新市場,于是同意收取0.3%的重映費,這相當于每賣出一張DVD,他們只能得到4美分,這是DVD制造商所得收入的1/10?,F(xiàn)在編劇們希望,如果在網(wǎng)上或手機上使用這些材料的話,可以支付給他們2.5%的重映費。
制片商稱,網(wǎng)絡傳播和家庭錄像是一樣的,因此將執(zhí)行原來的支付比率。如果相關內(nèi)容放在網(wǎng)上免費給網(wǎng)民收看,那么他們不會向編劇支付任何費用,因為這些是靠廣告支撐的,只是一種“宣傳”。雙方在傳統(tǒng)媒體費用支付上都做出了最后的讓步,但是由于新型媒體的權利對于編劇和制片商未來的收入都至關重要,因此雙方都不肯妥協(xié)。
那么誰的損失最多?“對于大多數(shù)制片商來說,這次罷工不會有什么影響,除非編劇可以有三到五個月不干活,”一家媒體集團的高級執(zhí)行官這樣說。因為實景劇和動畫片的編劇不是結合成一體的,因此廣播公司可以轉而播出其他形式的節(jié)目,體育節(jié)目也可以填補這個空白。但是信用評級機構Moody's認為,如果罷工一直持續(xù)到2008年末的話,財政就會受到嚴重影響。廣播網(wǎng)和有線付費頻道損失最大,因為它們依賴的就是節(jié)目的首輪放映。
當然有一些劇作家是很富有的。“跟我一起冒險的是一些身價百萬的家伙們,”實景和游戲編劇Lou DiMaggio這樣說,他曾因《贏到本·斯坦的錢》而獲得了艾美獎。但是他說,大部分的編劇年薪為5萬到7.5萬美元。DiMaggio說,他就是因為這次罷工打消了買房子的念頭。而級別低的編劇可能得回到擱置名單中了。但是,好萊塢是幸運的,因為大多數(shù)編劇都愿意響應他們的號召,不會拖延。Gary Goldman是在??怂褂捌就夤ぷ鞯木巹。?jīng)為科幻驚悚電影如《少數(shù)派報告》當過編劇,他說許多編劇都會在業(yè)余時間里寫電影劇本,他們希望可以碰碰運氣,看能否出售給制片商。