A college student was in a Philosophy class,where a class discussion about whether or not God exists was in progress.
The professor had the following logic:“Has anyone in this class heard God?”
Nobody spoke.
“Has anyone in this class touched God?”
Again,nobody spoke.
“Has anyone in this class seen God?”
When nobody spoke for the third time,he simply stated,“Then there is no GOD.”
The student did not like the sound of this at all,and asked for permission to speak.The professor granted it,and the student stood up and asked his classmates the following questions:
“Has anyone in this class heard our professor’s brain?”
Silence.
“Has anyone in this class touched our professor’s brain?”
Absolute silence.
“Has anyone in this class seen our professor’s brain?”
When nobody in the class dared to speak,the student concluded,“Then,according to our professor’s logic,it must be true that our professor has no brain!”
一名大學生在上哲學課,班級同學正在討論上帝是否存在。
教授談了以下的邏輯:“這個班里,有沒有人聽見過上帝的聲音?”
沒有人說話。
“這個班里,有沒有人觸摸過上帝?”
還是沒人說話。
“這個班里,有沒有人見過上帝?”
當?shù)谌螣o人說話時,他簡單地陳述道:“那就是沒有上帝。”
這名學生一點也不喜歡老師的這種邏輯,因此他要求教授允許他發(fā)言。教授同意了,學生站起來,問了他的同學們以下問題:
“這個班里,有沒有人聽見過老師大腦的聲音?”
一片沉寂。
“這個班里,有沒有人觸摸過老師的大腦?”
又是死一般的沉默。
“這個班里,有沒有人見過老師的大腦?”
班里沒有一個人敢說話,這時學生總結道:“那么,根據(jù)我們老師的邏輯,我們的老師一定沒有大腦?!?