似乎很多人抱怨老板如何不在乎員工,但是有一個(gè)棘手卻被人忽略的問(wèn)題——如果是員工常常不在乎老板呢?面對(duì)總是尋求著下一個(gè)工作機(jī)會(huì)的千禧一代,老板也有難以言喻的苦惱。
測(cè)試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識(shí):
loyalty忠誠(chéng);忠心['l???lt?]
feckless無(wú)效的;軟弱的;不負(fù)責(zé)任的['fekl?s]
defined contribution plans養(yǎng)老金固定繳款計(jì)劃
tear up撕毀(協(xié)議、合同等)
revel狂歡;陶醉['rev(?)l]
mock不尊重,蔑視;模擬的,虛假的[m?k]
exasperation惱怒;惡化[?g,z?sp?'re??(?)n]
By Michael Skapinker
A reader has emailed to object to a column I wrote about employees whose bosses do not care about them. What,he wrote,about employees who do not care about their bosses?
The reader runs a family business started by his father 90 years ago. It is the kind of company,he says,“where employees work with us,not for us”. Three of the current directors joined the company straight from school and have been with the business for a collective total of 100 years.
In recent years,the company took on four university graduates,trained them,promoted them and then doubled and,in one case,tripled their salaries. Today,only the one with the tripled salary is still there. The rest have left for other jobs.
This is not,the reader says,how employment should work.“Like a marriage there has to be co-operation and joint input,not take but no give. If the young are not happy today it is because they are too impatient,think only very short term and have no understanding of the word loyalty.”
The generation coming into the workplace today do not strike me as feckless. Many millennials seem serious,intelligent and recognise the world has changed.
They saw where job loyalty got their parents. Many of the older generation were pushed out before they were ready to go. Their final salary pension schemes were closed and replaced by defined contribution plans that will pay far less than they were hoping to live on. Consultants are now suggesting that even the promised annual increases to those old-fashioned pensions should be cut.
The reader’s organisation may well be an exception to this trend. But many companies tore up the implicit loyalty contracts they had with their employees. They can hardly be surprised if the children of those employees do not feel like signing up to new ones.
Employers need to be realistic about the world their millennial recruits live in. It is not just that they see no permanence to the jobs they are entering. They also have little prospect of being able to buy a home. With interest rates so low,any small savings they manage to accumulate will stay small.
So of course they are going to keep an eye out for the next,possibly better-paid,or more exciting job.
What can well-intentioned employers such as our reader do?
They can revel in their reputation as companies whose recruits leave for better jobs. There is also the chance that those who leave will one day be customers. If they succeed in their careers,your company will be noted on their LinkedIn profiles. They will probably send new recruits your way. They may even return as senior managers.
There were four journalists at that small magazine I worked for. Two of us were steadily rotating youngsters. The other two were older and had been there for some time. They were not as fast-paced but they made hugely experienced and accomplished mentors.
A mix of ages is worth aiming for. Those older employees could take some of the training strain off my reader. And even high-tech companies have older employees. As I heard one say:“I have clothes older than some of my colleagues.”
1.What kind of companies does the reader run for?
A. family business
B. government-owned corporation
C. limited liability company
D. foreign-funded enterprise
答案(1)
2.What are consultants suggesting now about those old-fashioned pensions?
A. should be cut
B. should be raised
C. should be eliminated
D. should be transferred to their children
答案(2)
3.Which one is not mentioned as the reason of employers need to be realistic?
A. millennials see no permanence to the jobs
B. millennials have little prospect
C. the interest rate is so low
D. millennials are too bored to work for a long time
答案(3)
4.What should well-intentioned employers do when recruits leave for better jobs?
A. work for the rest
B. revel in their reputation
C. pay them starter salaries
D. update LinkedIn profiles
答案(4)
(1) 答案:A.family business
解釋:他在一家90年前由老板父親創(chuàng)建的家族企業(yè)。
(2) 答案:A.should be cut
解釋:在父母那一代,離職時(shí)其最后工資的養(yǎng)老金計(jì)劃被關(guān)閉,取而代之的是遠(yuǎn)低于期待的固定繳款計(jì)劃。而顧問(wèn)們現(xiàn)在建議甚至承諾每年增加的過(guò)氣的養(yǎng)老金計(jì)劃也應(yīng)該削減。
(3) 答案:D.millennials are too bored to work for a long time
解釋:文章只提到下一份工作或許有更高的工資或者更讓人興奮的內(nèi)容,并沒(méi)有說(shuō)他們一定會(huì)感到無(wú)聊。
(4) 答案:B.revel in their reputation
解釋:出于善意的雇主應(yīng)該欣慰于他們的員工可以去更好的地方工作。